Discussion:
— #1: Garry Denke's $2,000,000.00 RCC Lawsuit
(too old to reply)
dolf
2018-08-31 08:27:28 UTC
Permalink
Whom are you that we ought consider any regard?

We have #8 Papal Bulls within our determination as legal recourse and we
are going to first assist others in their recompense and then we will take
the rest...

— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 29 August, 2018

For necessary purposes of contextualisation, we convey Nick Scarano's
(Assistant Professor at University of Tübingen, Germany) earlier prudent
meta-ethical, moral / political philosophical observation on "why the
[*ONTOLOGICAL*] '*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*' have a comparable modal {

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of* *priests*
x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =
1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of Humanity},
which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law, that is,
the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or
365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March 1996 / New
Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: REMEMBER THE
SABBATH DAY TO KEEP IT HOLY

} status to the '*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.' Laws of nature support
counterfactual arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they also must
have a modal status which is higher than simple contingency. The
connections formulated in them are also valid in all natural law governed,
possible worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal status of
necessity. The difference between laws of nature and laws of freedom
appears to consist primarily in the fact that the laws of nature are
concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while the laws
of freedom are concerned with all-quantified, normative bi-conditionals,
each receiving the modal status of necessity.

Actually, the type of necessity spoken of here has to be further specified.
Is it a matter of “logical,” “conceptual,” “nomological,” or “metaphysical”
possible worlds? Scarano (2001, chapter 3.2), argues that our moral
principles have a comparable status to the “metaphysical necessity”. To
Kant has to be ascribed the view that it is herewith a matter of
“conceptual necessity." Scarano sees an indication of this interpretation
in the method he applies in the first and second sections. He presupposes
that the content or the formula of the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE can be found
solely through the means of the conceptual analysis of our *MORAL*
*CONCEPTS*. At the beginning of the decisive argumentation, he writes,
“Regarding this problem we will first try to see whether perhaps the mere
concept of a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE does not also provide us with its
formula” (GMS, 420,18—20). And approximately twenty pages later, he asserts
in retrospect: "Yet that the specified principle of autonomy is the sole
principle of morals may well be established through the mere analysis of
the concepts of morality” (GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). He, therefore,
assumes that he actually was able to extract the formula of the supreme
moral principle solely through a conceptual analysis.

In my opinion, such a proceeding allows only one conclusion: *IF* *THE*
*MORAL* *PRINCIPLE* *CAN* *BE* *PRODUCED* *SOLELY* *THROUGH* *AN*
*ANALYTICAL* *PROCEDURE* *ON* *OUR* *CONCEPT* *OF* *MORALITY*, *THEN* *IT*
*WOULD* *HAVE* *THE* *STATUS* *OF* *CONCEPTUAL* *NECESSITY*. According to
Kant, the founding law of the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE is valid in all
conceptually possible worlds. The queson of which type of necessity moral
principles exhibit, however, is not essential for the ensuing reflections.
[Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

2.3 NECESSITY {OBEDIENT}, NORMATIVITY {AIDING} AND APRIORITY {ASSISTING}
A possible but easily avoidable equivocation in the expression [*ONTIC*]
necessity can be cleared up at this juncture. Sometimes the expression is
used in the realm of morality as a synonym of normativity or
prescriptivity. Consequently, actions are necessary if they connote a
“should” or if it is our *DUTY* {

VIS-A-VIS the prescription conveyed by SECTION VIII to Queen Victoria's
Letters Patent of 29 October 1900 as instrumentation to the Federation of
the Australian Commonwealth of 1901: And We do hereby REQUIRE and COMMAND
ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE
INHABITANTS of Our said Commonwealth TO BE *OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, AND
*ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General

} to carry them out. This type of usage is also found in Kant. In the
central “third proposition” of the first part of the Groundwork, this usage
is clearly expressed: “*DUTY* *IS* *THE* *NECESSITY* *OF* *AN* *ACTION*
*FROM* *RESPECT* *FOR* *THE* *LAW*” (GMS, 400,18 f.). While the [*ONTIC*]
necessity analyzed previously refers to the moral principles, it is here a
matter of the necessity of the action itself. However this aspect is
terminologically classified, whether as “normative,” “prescriptive,”
“evaluative,” or whether one speaks of the imperative character of moral
judgments, it may be distinctly distinguished from the modal-logical
concept of necessity responsible for the counterfactual variations.

In the preliminary formulations (P1) through (P3), this logical quality has
yet to be expressed. In (Pl') the modal status of necessity, therefore, is
explicitly taken up into the formulation:

(P1') Necessarily, for all objects x:
if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral quality
M.

Applied to Kantian ethics, this thought results in the following
formulation of Kant’s fundamental principle:

(P2') Necessarily, for all actions x: .
if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion CI, does x satisfy the demand of
morality.

The proposition (P3) is also to be completed accordingly:

(P3') Necessarily, for all maxims x and all actions y:
if, and only if, the underlying maxim x of the action y has the quality
that the actor of y can will at the same time that x becomes a general law,
does y satisfy the demand of morality.

In the propositions (Pl') through (P3') this aspect — that is, necessity in
the sense of “normative,” “prescriptive,” or “evaluative” — is indeed
contained. There it is connected, however, to the moral predicate, not the
operator of necessity. When I speak of necessity in the following sections,
I mean a modal quality of judgments and not the specificum of normativity.

Kant uses the expression necessity with yet other meanings. Every
interpretation depends on the clarification in each particular context of
what Kant exactly intends in those corresponding places and of how each
particular argument is to be reconstructed. Next to

(a) the type of usage as a modal operator that makes counterfactual
considerations possible and
(b) the usage in the sense of an imperative character, thus in the sense of
“normativity” or “prescriptivity,” there is
(c) an often encountered usage with an epistemological meaning.

If expression is used in this sense, then it means as much as “necessary
know-ability,” that is, the independence of knowledge from contingent,
empirical factors. Typically, Kant uses the expression a priori for
judgments that exhibit this characteristic. Since this type of usage also
can be clearly distinguished from the modal one, I will speak of apriority
to designate this epistemological aspect. I will use necessity solely in
the first sense (a).

Kant doubtlessly sees a close connection between necessity and apriority.
He often moves quickly from the one concept to the other without grounding
the transition. The two concepts, however, originate from varying spheres.
While necessity is a matter of the modal status of judgments, apriority is
an epistemological concept. In the former case, the concern is the
application of predicates to objects of other possible worlds. In the later
case, it is a matter of the knowability of the relevant judgments. Between
the two concepts there does not seem to be a close conceptual connection.
In particular cases it must be explicitly argued for that apriority follows
from necessity.

Even if Kant sees a very close connection between the two concepts, he does
not appear to assume that necessity and apriority are exchangeable
concepts. In the central passage of the Preface. he formulates rather an
argument for their connection. In the following section, Scarano sketches
out a possible reconstruction of the argumentation's structure on the basis
of the conceptual differences just worked out. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 11-12]

As there being a prerequisite for hypothetical and conjectural postulate of
such cognitive reality which I have desire to grasp (ie. there may be
semantical misapprehensions: mais nous faisons de notre mieux) is a notion
of contingency as a quantum sensibility within the context of a
metaphysical philosophical derivation where there is a normative absence or
a substitution of *ONTIC* necessity as the factuality of being so without
being so and which whilst absent of quantitative certainty yet has a
provisional possibility for occurrence or eventuality.

And we note at this juncture that the signs-‘OTH {#2184 / #364 - ADMITTANCE
{

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]

IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}

DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

} v’s #2184 / #312 - RESISTANCE {

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 - Totality
of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

} #2184 / #728 - REACTANCE {

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature: {DOUBLE:
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

}} become reversed in the admittance domain; ie. capacitive susceptance is
positive and inductive susceptance is negative.

ADMITTANCE {YANG CH'I AS MALE} AND RESISTANCE {YIN AS FEME}
Within electrical engineering, admittance is a measure of how easily a
circuit or device will allow a current to flow. It is defined as the
reciprocal of impedance.

Resistance is a measure of the opposition of a circuit to the flow of a
steady current, while impedance takes into account not only the resistance
but also dynamic effects which are known as ‘OTH {#2184 / #3}: #728 -
REACTANCE {

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]

DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

) is here conveyed as substantial form (forma substantialis) by liability.
Likewise, admittance is not only a measure of the ease with which a steady
current can flow, but also the dynamic effects of the material's
susceptance to the contingent eventuality of polarisation.

Within electrical and electronic systems, reactance is the opposition of a
circuit element to a change in current or voltage, due to that element's
inductance or capacitance. The notion of reactance is similar to electrical
resistance, but it differs in several respects.

Thus I wish to obtain as semantical construct some philosophical conception
about the notion of contingency as to the dynamic effect of reactance and
the materia prima susceptibility to eventuality of polarisation as materia
secunda as an alternative canonical approach to mathematically expressing
these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME} bi-conditionals in
terms of an electrical circuit:

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} -
Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage / sovereign
dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus} Empire
Governance] 

As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
(materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then the
*MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea, shape
or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei essentialis
sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of righteousness,
holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God in which man was
originally created).

H5674@{
   @1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 76 (#76),
   @2: Sup: 65 (#141); Ego: 70 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @3: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 2 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#232); Ego: 38 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   @5: Sup: 74 (#306); Ego: 50 (#236),
   @6: Sup: 80 (#386); Ego: 6 (#242),
   Male: #386; Feme: #242
} // #728

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #728 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186

#728 as [#400, #70, #2, #200, #50, #6] = `abar (H5674): {UMBRA: #5 as #728
% #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *PASS* *OVER* *OR* *BY* *OR* *THROUGH*, alienate,
bring, carry, do away, take, take away, transgress; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to pass
over, cross, cross over, pass over, march over, overflow, go over; 1a2) to
pass beyond; 1a3) to pass through, traverse; 1a3a) passers-through
(participle); 1a3b) *TO* *PASS* *THROUGH* (*THE* *PARTS* *OF* *VICTIM* *IN*
*COVENANT*);

“Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees {set apart} a council,
and said, What do we? For this man doeth many miracles.

If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: {

“[Ye] #351 - serpents, [ye] #33 - generation of vipers, how can ye escape
the #312 - damnation of hell?” [Matthew 23:33 (KJV)]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O #33
- generation of #351 - vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 -
wrath to come?” [Luke 3:7 (KJV)]

} and the Romans {strength; power} shall come and take away both our place
and nation.

And one of them, named Caiaphas {he that seeks with diligence; one that
vomiteth}, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know
nothing at all,

Nor consider that it is expedient for us, *THAT* *ONE* *MAN* *SHOULD* *DIE*
*FOR* *THE* *PEOPLE*, and that the whole nation perish not.

And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he
prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation;

And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in
one the children of God that were scattered abroad.

Then from that day forth they took counsel together for to put him to death
{

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"



The 33 #CENTRE of the first square is the KING as SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE
dynamic which corresponds to the historic reality of the crucifixion of
Christ on AROUND 1500 HOURS ON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.

} Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence
unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim
{fruitful; increasing: #15 CE ... #34 CE ... #65 CE ... #111 CE ... #175 CE
... 260 CE ... #369 CE}, and there continued with his disciples.

And the Jews' passover was nigh at hand: and many went out of the country
up to Jerusalem {vision of peace / Jerusha: banished; possession;
inheritance} before the passover, to purify themselves.” [John 11:47-55
(KJV}

1a4) to pass along, pass by, overtake and pass, sweep by; 1a4a) passer-by
(participle); 1a4b) to be past, be over; 1a5) to pass on, go on, pass on
before, go in advance of, pass along, travel, advance; 1a6) to pass away;
1a6a) to emigrate, leave (one's territory); 1a6b) to vanish; 1a6c) to
perish, cease to exist; 1a6d) to become invalid, become obsolete (of law,
decree); 1a6e) to be alienated, pass into other hands; 1b) (Niphal) to be
crossed; 1c) (Piel) to impregnate, cause to cross; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
cause to pass over, cause to bring over, cause to cross over, make over to,
dedicate, devote; 1d2) to cause to pass through; 1d3) to cause to pass by
or beyond or under, let pass by; 1d4) to cause to pass away, cause to take
away; 1e) (Hithpael) to pass over;

Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis for
all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of a thing
including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia) as the
integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living in
compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the innate
*MORAL* (lex moralis primordialis).

“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

"I AM FROM ABOVE {#41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your parents
... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy ...
#205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear false witness ... #287 - Covet Not ...
#328 ... #369}: YE ARE OF THIS WORLD {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

}; I AM NOT OF THIS WORLD.” [John 8:23 (KJV)]

"AND JESUS ANSWERING SAID UNTO THEM, THE CHILDREN {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as
BELIAL - ANKH / ROMAN} OF THIS WORLD MARRY {#ONE: #99 / #297 <-- *AS* *THE*
*FOUNDATION* *STONE* (*USURPING* @1 = *SOVEREIGN* / #CENTRE @5 = *LAST*
*WILL*, *TESTAMENT* *OF* #INR *BEING* *THE* *BINDING* *NORM* (*NORMA*
*OBLIGANS* ) *ON* #33 AD) *MAGIC* *SQUARE

@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INR
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776

@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity

@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 -
Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}

#1 (9) - OUHOUYAH (King-Seraphim) = #1
#9 (8) - HAZIEL (King-Cherubim) = #10
#17 (7) - LEVYAH (King-Throne) = #27 <-- SOVEREIGNTY / PYTHAGOREAN TERNIO
ANAGRAM TO #INR
#25 (6) - NETEHYAH (King-Dominion) = #52 <-- *THEY* *ARE* *AS* *THE* *SONS*
*OF* *DARKNESS* *NOT* *THE* *SONS* *OF* *LIGHT* / *GOD* *AS* #123

#33 (5) - YHOUYAH (King-Powers) = #85 <-- ADAMANT {ie. fixed mind /
dogmatic} / DIAMOND 💍
#41 (4) - HEHAHEL (King-Virtues) = #126
#49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175 <-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 /
#175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN* *ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*

#57 (2) - NEMAMYAH (King-Archangels) = #232
#65 - *SOLDIER* (1) - DAMBYAN (King-Angels) = #297

VIRTUE as MIND: {#1 + #2 = #3} +
TOOLS as SCIENCE: {#3 + #4 = #7} +
POSITION as OPINION: {#5 + #6 = #11 as Collegium of Pontiffs from 510 BCE
as AS PONTIFICATED DEIFIED IGNORANCE BEING NARCISSISM} +
TIME as SENSE: {#7 + #8 = #15}

= #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law +
H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity)

6x6 = #36 / #111 / #666 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}

45 5 61
53 37 21
13 69 29

= #111 / #333 {#FIVE}

Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI
TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and
causal basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition:

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}

42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}

43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}

#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach (H2873): {#2 as #19 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1) to slaughter, slay, butcher, kill
ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to slay, kill
ruthlessly (figurative);

44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}

#419 as [#2, #1, #6, #400, #10] = 'avvah (H185): {#0 as #12 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH*/ *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #FOUR: #108 / #324} 1) desire, lust, will (not necessarily
evil);

49 9 65
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#NINE} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73
SUBSTITUTION}

74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF

My objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 /
#33 - #INR / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390
/ #288 / #419} war dead and usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 -
HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth’s Governance which is defined as a
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria’s
Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation
into a nation.

}, AND ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE {#175 AS ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE}: BUT THEY WHICH
SHALL BE ACCOUNTED WORTHY TO OBTAIN THAT WORLD, AND THE RESURRECTION FROM
THE DEAD, NEITHER MARRY, NOR ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE: NEITHER CAN THEY DIE
ANY MORE: FOR THEY ARE EQUAL UNTO THE ANGELS; AND ARE THE CHILDREN OF GOD {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] *OR* *SONS* *OF* *GOD* [*FOR*
*ANGELS*]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie
sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*,
*CLASS*;

}, BEING THE CHILDREN OF THE RESURRECTION." [Luke 20:34-36 (KJV)]

Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as being
primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate understanding which
grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and spontaneously acts
according to the dictates as wants and desires of conscientia) and the
natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either impresses by God upon the
*MIND* of all the people or immediately discerned by the reason in its
encounter with the order of nature) as a covenant of nature (foedus
naturae: predicated on the original integrity of human nature and its
capacity for obedience under the terms if the innate *MORAL* or natural
law) bestowed upon us by the graciousness of God.

STRATEGIC: SUCCESS AND MATERIAL GAIN
VIII - And We do hereby REQUIRE and COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS,
CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS of Our said Commonwealth
TO BE OBEDIENT, AIDING, AND ASSISTING unto Our said Governor General, or,
in the event of his death, INCAPACITY, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, FROM TIME TO TIME, under the PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR
LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER THE GOVERNMENT of Our said Commonwealth.

Thanks for your assistance!

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 29 August 2018

#CONTINGENCY #DEATH #INCAPACITY
Garry Denke's $2,000,000.00 RCC Lawsuit
Original Message
Created at: Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:02 AM (Delivered after 0 seconds)
Subject: Garry Denke's $2,000,000.00 RCC Lawsuit
Download Original Copy to clipboard
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:a0dd:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 09:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:02:19 -0500
Subject: Garry Denke's $2,000,000.00 RCC Lawsuit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba458d0573e0086f"
--000000000000ba458d0573e0086f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
Fucked hard right up the ass!
Dick straight in the mouth!
I should've let him burn!
Cock fucking faggot!
Garry Denke
Garry Denke
--000000000000ba458d0573e0086f
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><a href=3D"https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standar=
dspeaker/">https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/</a><div=
<a href=3D"https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/">https=
://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/</a><br><div><br></div><=
Rev. Girard F. Angelo</div><div>Rev. Girard F. Angelo<br></div><div><br=
</div><div>Fucked hard right up the ass!</div><div>Dick straight in the mo=
uth!</div><div>I should&#39;ve let him burn!</div><div>Cock fucking faggot!=
</div></div><div><br></div><div>Garry Denke</div><div>Garry Denke</div></di=
--000000000000ba458d0573e0086f--
RCC YOU ARE GOING TO PAY $2M
you Holy Ghost blaspheme Faggots!
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/diocese-of-scranton-releases-extended-sexual-abuse-list-1.2373378
https://www.timesleader.com/opinion/op-ed/715019/their-view-memories-of-childhood-priest-now-in-serious-doubt
https://www.citizensvoice.com/grand-jury-sex-abuse-report-identified-59-priests-in-the-diocese-of-scranton-1.2373314
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/street-named-after-reverend-in-question-1.2374907
Fucked hard right up the ass!
Dick straight in the mouth!
I should've let him burn!
Cock fucking faggot!
Garry Denke
Garry Denke
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
JESUS CHRIST
the Creator
Angelo, Girard F.
Born: 04/9/1927
Ordained: 1955
Died: June 29, 2009
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fkscvntw576e4p5/Angelo.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fkscvntw576e4p5/Angelo.pdf?dl=0
Saint Matthew, Stroudsburg, 6/20/1955
Saint Thomas, Archbald, 10/5/1955
Saint Lucy, Scranton, 9/24/1959
Saint Francis, Scranton, 9/19/1962
Mater Dolorosa, Williamsport, 7/1/1963
Our Lady of Grace, Hazleton, 9/3/1969
Saint Raphael, Harleigh, 3/2/1972
Saint Raphael, Harleigh, 9/4/1973
Sacred Heart of Jesus, Harleigh (Pastor Emeritus), 7/3/2003
http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/an_inspiring_shrine_to_the_sacred_heart_of_jesus
http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/an_inspiring_shrine_to_the_sacred_heart_of_jesus
Canonical status: Permanently removed from ministry.

Bernie Kushmider's Landscaping
Garry W. Denke, a foreman
Ralph J. Ferdinand, crew
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/diocese-of-scranton-releases-extended-sexual-abuse-list-1.2373378
https://www.timesleader.com/opinion/op-ed/715019/their-view-memories-of-childhood-priest-now-in-serious-doubt
https://www.citizensvoice.com/grand-jury-sex-abuse-report-identified-59-priests-in-the-diocese-of-scranton-1.2373314
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/street-named-after-reverend-in-question-1.2374907
Garry Denke
Denoco Inc.
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
JESUS
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker!!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/WRkmwlXr7gg
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/umFbAVVfzs4
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/h8NKvi5itmo
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker?!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/Jo0juWbi4mM
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/oRF4V0av4Ag
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/65KuJU3MAA4
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker!?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlements_and_bankruptcies_in_Catholic_sex_abuse_cases
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sex_abuse_cases_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sex_abuse_cases_by_country
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker!!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/HZRy4YZ5qWw
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/Yz-2YV0hKIo
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/XAgSCdzuNYY
G-D
--
The Manifesto of David Koresh
Manifesto of Koresh
The seven Spirits of God are seven of the portable gold artifacts (relics) from
the 1st Spirit - gold Mercy Seat
the 2nd Spirit - gold Ark of the Testimony
the 3rd Spirit - gold Table for the Shewbread
the 4th Spirit - gold Candlestick
the 5th Spirit - gold Ephod-Girdle
the 6th Spirit - gold Breastplate
the 7th Spirit - gold Altar of Incense
המשכן, transliterated Mishkan),
also portable. In the Book of Exodus they are listed and described (Ex
25-40) and in the Book of
Rev 1:4 - John to the seven churches which are in Asia: Grace be unto
you, and peace, from him
which is, and which was, and which is to come; and from the seven
Spirits which are before his
throne;
Rev 3:1 - And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things
saith he that hath the seven
Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a
name that thou livest, and art
dead.
Rev 4:5 - And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and
voices: and there were
seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God.
Rev 5:6 - And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the
four beasts, and in the midst of
the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and
seven eyes, which are the
seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth.
1 - the Spirit of wisdom and understanding,
2 - the Spirit of counsel and might;
3 - the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the LORD.
Mishkan is under Stonehenge Temple, 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone on
bottom of Scroll Trench,
go unearth Exodus' Tabernacle, the seven
Spirits of God, instead of shooting at our children.
David Koresh, Lamb of God
and Lambs' manifesto.
April 1, 1993 AM
Holy Ghost
--
The Manifesto of David Koresh
Manifesto of Koresh
The seven Seals first (1st) Seal at Stonehenge Temple was found at the
intersection of Scroll Trench and the elder Helestone Ditch (where it
once was). Located 2 ft (0.61m) East of Lt-Col William Hawley's 19 May
1923 unexcavated C6 right-angled triangle hypotenuse center at a depth
of 4.5 ft (1.37m) below ground level (GL), this westernmost first (1st)
Seal is now in British Museum. An EM (electromagnetic conductivity)
survey of the remaining six (6) Seals show them distributed at intervals
of one Seal per cubit (1.5 ft, 0.46m) as measured from the horizontal
surface plane. These Seals progressively deepen toward the East downward
to EM detected Tabernacle's (Mishkan's) gold, silver, brass, iron below
Helestone's face of a man (Ez. 1:10, 10:14; Rev. 4:7).
BEGINNING at the first (1st) Phocaea (Ionia) 600 BC produced electrum
stater Seal located along the bottom of Scroll Trench, a 7th-6th century
BC earthwork at Stonehenge Temple, County of Wiltshire, Great Britain,
United Kingdom, said first (1st) Seal found by Robert Newall on 19 May
1923 at the intersection of Scroll Trench and the elder Helestone Ditch
(where it once was), and said first (1st) Seal located 2 ft (0.61m) East
of said Lt-Col William Hawley's 19 May 1923 unexcavated C6 right-angled
triangle hypotenuse center at a depth of 4.5 ft (1.37m) below ground level (GL) surface;
THENCE East 1.5ft (0.46m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected second (2nd) Seal;
THENCE East 1.5 ft (0.46m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected third (3rd) Seal;
THENCE East 2 ft (0.61m)) down Scroll Trench to EM detected fourth (4th) Seal;
THENCE East 2 ft (0.61m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected fifth (5th) Seal;
THENCE East 2.5 ft (0.76m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected sixth (6th) Seal;
THENCE East 2.5ft (0.76m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected seventh (7th) Seal;
THENCE East 3.0 ft (0.91m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected gold, silver, brass, iron;
THE THRONE BEGINNING; in the County of Wiltshire, Great Britain, United Kingdom.
David Koresh
O Lion of Juda
April 1, 1993 AM
Loading Image...
Loading Image...
Holy Ghost
--
The Manifesto of David Koresh
Manifesto of Koresh
You're right.
Nobody.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/183985345/
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/183985345
https://yuki.la/pol/183985345
G-D
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-31 08:27:38 UTC
Permalink
Whom are you that we ought consider any regard?

We have #8 Papal Bulls within our determination as legal recourse and we
are going to first assist others in their recompense and then we will take
the rest...

— TREASON: NECESSITY {OBEDIENT: BREACHES OF PROBITY / DECORUM}, NORMATIVITY
{AIDING: JUDICIAL DISCRETION ON PENALTY} AND APRIORITY {ASSISTING: SECTION
VIII COMPLIANCE ON DEATH PENALTY PROSCRIPTIONS}

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 August, 2018

That SOVEREIGNTY can also be viewed as being a metaphysical philosophical
derivation of moral or morality which is notionally a DECOROUS DEMUR (E)
where the PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC has an ONTOLOGICAL REALITY which
arbitrarily may have embodiment and is therefore a normative presence of
*ONTIC* necessity as then the factuality of being so without being so.

It is not a personality but similarly has an opulent quality of a tempered
integrity from which all imperfection is dispelled: How else can the
monarchal French President occupy the Palace of Versailles?

YOUTUBE: "Let Them Eat Cake - The Pox"



Emmanuel Macron, increasingly compared with Louis XIV, on 10 July 2017
addressed both houses of parliament in a rare session at the Sun King’s
palace in Versailles. Where France’s popular new centrist president
charted his government’s course and set priorities at the joint session of
Congress — consisting of the National Assembly and the Senate.

'It is important that he [Macron] sets a direction,' said the spokesman.

The French media often refer to Mr Macron as 'Jupiter', the king {#34} of
the Roman deities and one of the names used by Louis XIV, who moved the
seat of power to Versailles in 1682.

Morale which is imbued from this transcendent principle, also known as
esprit de corps, is the capacity of a group's members to maintain belief
within the dictums of NECESSITY {LIBERTÉ}, NORMATIVITY {ÉGALITÉ} AND
APRIORITY {FRATERNITÉ} AS A CONTINGENT {OU LA MORT} REALITY RATHER THAN A
CONTINGENCY OF EXPEDIENCY.

The implied meaning is that there is no terrestrial king of all humanity,
you as a person have the ontological egalitarian entitlement to your own
body, life and destiny which is known as the rights of man that is often
quantified by a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which is enamoured as an institution
or goal, particularly in the face of opposition or hardship. Morale is
often referenced by authority figures as a generic value judgment of the
willpower, obedience, and self-discipline of a group tasked with performing
duties assigned by a superior.

To those ends, we are building a capacity so as to propose the prudent
argument whereby criminal acts accompanying public slander as BOER / ANZAC
defamation may be viewed within the quantitative context of a hedonism as
pestilent and indolent lifestyle having a self bestowed prerogative
entitlement as an immutability of being which is ostensibly obstinate
ignorance facilitated by a delusional mind characteristic of psychosis.

In terms of fiscal consequences, we see a greater benefit in the
circumstance that the resolution to this dilemma is not a bestowal of a
lengthy prison term as decadent outcome that is consequential to protracted
and torturous justice facilitated by an economy of the State as sponsored
legal aid which is accorded to persons whom have categorically no intention
in having any accountability for the *ONTIC* necessity as the factuality of
their actions being so.

Accordingly we are going to make an exemplar of those persons as a
cautionary action made against the predilection of others whom similarly
mistakenly believe in such viability of obstinate will as an alternative
ontological experience which is entirely absent or feigns any *DUTY* or
concern for civil regard as respect for the law.

By way of a non prejudiced example is the situational context as haughty
Islamic practice in refusing to stand before judicial officials and judges
exercising their powers and authority under the auspices of DIEU ET MON
DROIT as which according to my sensibilities is more adequately addressed
by a non contradictory and resolute penalty, an ex-judiciary authority
provisioned in the motherhood watch-care of ontological principles which is
prudently exercised by the office of GOVERNOR GENERAL.

Categorically such obstinate and adamant will as misnomered pretext to
piety ought not exist within the Federation as Commonwealth of Australia.

And under the auspices as gravitas of any indictment for TREASON then
proscribe as necessity a normative descriptive penalty as equivalent to
eradication of vermin by means of the apriority power and authority
accorded by prerogative of LETTERS PATENT, and furthermore that any
substantial costs of exorbitant corrective services such as imprisonment
which has no viability within the circumstance of a more direct penalty, is
then properly apportioned towards invigorating programs which addresses
indigenous disadvantage, their societal declension and disenfranchised
autonomy.

2.4 THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT IN THE PREFACE
In the central passage of the Preface on the indispensability of a pure
moral philosophy, Kant does not simply presuppose that from the “*ABSOLUTE*
*NECESSITY*” (GMS, 389,13) of moral laws the apriority of moral philosophy
follows. Rather he delivers a detailed, even if difficult, line of
argumentation. First of all, he announces his aim of argumentation and
designates his point of departure: “THAT IT IS OF THE UTMOST NECESSITY TO
WORK OUT ONCE A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” or “THAT THERE MUST BE SUCH IS
SELF--EVIDENT FROM THE COMMON IDEA OF DUTY AND OF THE MORAL LAWS" (GMS,
389,7-11). The aim of his argumentation, therefore, is the proof go the
apriority of moral philosophy:

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}
STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta descriptor
prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift} (1139 CE) /
Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature {MOTHER
(INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of decree deciding
between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2 -
Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents} / #14
/ #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone): Militia
Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do Not Kill} /
#15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its
Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson, child,
member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. -
male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f)
sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or
sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless
things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*,
*ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR / Do
Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John 5:39-47
(KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 - Nature
Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not Steal} /
#17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming
Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial /
bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 - Form
of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso {#7
- The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do Not
Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
   @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
   @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
   @3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
   @4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
   @5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
   @6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
   @7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
   @8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
   @9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
   Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

    #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
    #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
    #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
    #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
    #CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
   @1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
   @2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 - I
INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c)
*WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*, *WHAT*
*IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]

#1 - unwillingness
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN definition:
NOLUNTĀTIS]

*VOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such as
mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of the natural world.

*NOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used in
reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of Sir
Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth I's
treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.

} And his point of departure for the argumentation lies in the analysis of
our concept of *DUTY* or of our “idea” of moral laws. How can the
individual steps {ie. #41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy
... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear no false witness ... #287 - Covet
Not ... #328 - Transformative Prototype ... #369 - Reverse Transcriptase
Inhibitor with #164 - Chronological Plane Mapping} of this very dense
argumentation be distinguished from each other and ordered?

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
Sabbath]) ...
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
Honour your parents]) ...
#65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123 -
Do not kill]) ...
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
#175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205 -
Do not steal]) ...
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 - Bear
no false witness]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable. First of all, it will become
clear that in the passage of the text an argumentative progression takes
place from the givenness of a modal quality to the proof of an
epistemological quality distinguished from it. And secondly, an argument
not implausible even from a contemporary viewpoint comes to light for the
intermediate thesis (1). For, as shown above, it is the task of an ethical
principle to guide our valuations even in the case of counterfactual
considerations. If this is correct, then an analysis of our concept of
morality can help bring to light the modal status that is responsible for
the capacity of meeting this task. The argumentative progression from the
point of departure to thesis (1), therefore, appears well-motivated.
Through the analysis of our concept of morality we find that moral laws
also apply to counterfactual situations, that they consequently exhibit the
modal status of necessity.

Kant distinguishes at this point between moral laws and moral duties. From
a moral law (“THE GROUND OF AN OBLIGATION”: GMS, 389,12) arises a moral
duty (“OBLIGATION”) to which our actions have to conform. As an example of
an obligation, Kant names “THE COMMAND '*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT* *TO* *LIE*'”
(GMS, 389,13 f.). It is interesting to observe that Kant ascribes the
decisive “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY” not to the duty, but rather to the law {ie.
#111 - IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER}
that is foundational to the duty. This, too, serves as an indication that
the term necessity is to be understood as a modal expression {@1 - Nature
Contains Nature, @5 - Act of Nature, @6 - Form of Nature, @7 - Engendering
Nature, @2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature, @3 - Nature Surmounts Nature,
@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature, @8 - Transforming Nature, @9 -
Autonomous Nature} and not in the sense of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” Otherwise Kant would speak of the necessity of an action
instead of the necessity of the law foundational for obligation.

The point of departure, “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY,” may be read therefore as a
modal status {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287 ...
#328 ... #369} of moral principles. How, then, are the other intermediate
steps to be understood? The basis in the text is extremely narrow. One
possibility of outlining the continued line of argumentation is as follows:

YOUTUBE: "The Weirding Way - Dune (1984)"



In the next step, Kant seems to refer to a counterfactual thought
experiment. Among the counterfactual situations to which duties are
attributed are those in which not humans but other imaginable rational
beings have the possibility of acting. In such a thought experiment, we
imagine a world in which there are other beings capable of action. Since
the moral laws accepted by us first of all contain the modal status of
necessity — that is, they apply to all possible worlds — and secondly,
involve a proposition about all actions, it is to be concluded that even
those actions of these merely imagined rational beings fall under these
laws. The second intermediate thesis, therefore, states that (2) the
*DUTIES* arising from the moral laws are also relevant for the action of
these merely imagined [as #41 x n = *ONTIC* NECESSITY as “NORMATIVITY”
being measured / moderated categories or “PRESCRIPTIVITY” by
meta-descriptor prototype and ethical value statement by which evaluative %
(#41 x n) judgment can be made by] rational beings. In Kant’s terms:
“EVERYONE MUST ADMIT THAT [...] THE COMMAND ‘*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT* *TO* *LIE*
[is normatively #41 x6 = #246 as NORMA OBLIGANS]’ IS VALID NOT MERELY FOR
HUMAN BEINGS, AS THOUGH OTHER RATIONAL BEINGS DID NOT HAVE TO HEED IT”
(GMS, 389,11-15).

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
[PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]

"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"



YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"



*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.

ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>

H7022@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 25 (#31); Ego: 19 (#25),
   @3: Sup: 35 (#66); Ego: 10 (#35),
   @4: Sup: 54 (#120); Ego: 19 (#54),
   @5: Sup: 3 (#123); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @6: Sup: 9 (#132); Ego: 6 (#90),
   @7: Sup: 59 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
   Male: #191; Feme: #140
} // #302

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity;
I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*.

    #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
    #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
    #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
    #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
    #CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
   @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
   @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
   @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;

"Thou art filled with shame for glory: drink thou also, and let thy
foreskin be uncovered: the cup of the LORD'S right hand shall be turned
unto thee, and shameful {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] =
qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} spewing {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30,
#6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} shall be on thy glory." [Habakkuk
2:16 (KJV)]

H4687@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 49 (#89); Ego: 9 (#49),
   @3: Sup: 55 (#144); Ego: 6 (#55),
   @4: Sup: 50 (#194); Ego: 76 (#131),
   @5: Sup: 60 (#254); Ego: 10 (#141),
   Male: #254; Feme: #141
} // #546

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #546 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.

    #VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
    #TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
    #POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
    #TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
    #CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
   @1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
   @2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
   @3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
   @4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);

"Because that Abraham {FATHER OF A GREAT MULTITUDE} obeyed my voice, and
kept my charge, my commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] =
mitsvah (H4687): commandments}, my statutes, and my laws." [Genesis 26:5
(KJV)]

"And said, If thou wilt diligently hearken to the voice of the LORD thy
God, and wilt do that which is right in his sight, and wilt give ear to his
commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments}, and keep all his statutes, I will put none of these diseases
upon thee, which I have brought upon the Egyptians {THAT TROUBLES OR
OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}: for I am the LORD that healeth thee." [Exodus 15:26
(KJV)]

"And the LORD said unto Moses {TAKEN OUT; DRAWN FORTH}, How long refuse ye
to keep my commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah
(H4687): commandments} and my laws?" [Exodus 16:28 (KJV)]

"And God spake all these words, saying, I am the LORD thy God, which have
brought thee out of the land of Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
ANGUISH}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods before
me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any
thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is
in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor
serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity
of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of
them that hate me; And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me,
and keep my commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah
(H4687): commandments}." [Exodus 20:1-6 (KJV)]

At this juncture the decisive transition from necessity to apriority takes
place. Since the applicability of obligation is valid for all imaginable
rational beings, the cognition of these obligations or the laws that are
responsible for them cannot depend on contingent features that arise from
the fact that the thought experiment involves different rational beings.
The laws, therefore, may solely depend on characteristics that all rational
beings capable of action have in common. What all imaginable rational
beings have in common, however, is solely the characteristic of being
rational beings. Every other characteristic is contingent. The cognition of
laws cannot depend, therefore, upon the empirical cognition of these
contingent features.

Since Kant improperly states it is an impossibility for a human being to
accomplish this by transcendent sapiential thought and I am capably able to
demonstrate it's temporal congruence as coherence by a mathematical
theoretical noumenon in being an Intellectual Property by which Immanuel
Kant himself calls noumena as the proof of a valid and rational concept
attained by pure thought. And theoretically it is technically possible by
an analysis of the TELOS HIERARCHY
<http://www.grapple369.com?telos:328&PROTOTYPE:HETEROS> to then make a
rational determination upon the contingent characteristics such as to the
nature of the implicit #328 - Transformative Prototype or propositions on
what prototype might optimally be deployed.

Kant seems to assume that a cognition contains the characteristic of
apriority if it is not dependent upon empirical perceptions. Consequently,
according to the next intermediate thesis (3), the cognition of moral laws
must be a priori. Kant himself expresses this decisive intermediate
conclusion in the following terms: Among the things to which everyone must
admit is the fact that “THE GROUND OF AN OBLIGATION,” that is, the moral
law, “IS TO BE SOUGHT NOT IN THE NATURE OF THE HUMAN BEING OR THE
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WORLD IN WHICH HE IS PLACED, BUT A PRIORI SOLELY IN
CONCEPTS OF PURE REASON” (GMS, 389,16-19).

At the beginning of the ensuing paragraph, Kant reiterates this
intermediate conclusion: “THUS [...] ARE MORAL LAWS TOGETHER WITH THEIR
PRINCIPLES ESSENTIALLY DISTINGUISHED [...] FROM EVERYTHING ELSE IN WHICH
THERE IS ANYTHING EMPIRICAL” (GMS, 389,24-26). And he continues with his
last step of argumentation, which leads him to the concluding thesis (4)
that there has to be a pure moral philosophy. This step constituted simply
by the consequences drawn from the epistemological status of moral laws for
the construction of philosophical theories. If moral laws can only be
known a priori, then moral theory must have a foundational part that
proceeds purely a priori, that is, without reference to anything empirical.
In Kant’s words, “ALL MORAL PHILOSOPHY RESTS ENTIRELY ON ITS PURE PART, AND
WHEN APPLIED TO THE HUMAN BEING IT BORROWS NOT THE LEAST BIT FROM KNOWLEDGE
ABOUT HIM (ANTHROPOLOGY)” (GMS, 389,26-29).

This is one of the possible approaches for a systematic reconstruction of
the central argument in the Preface. Unfortunately, Kant offers very few
suggestions of how he can assume that the thesis that there has to be a
pure moral philosophy is self-evident. Consequently, much interpretation is
required. And much of the interpretive work revolves around which
systematic concept of necessity is implemented in the interpretation. The
interpretation presented here bases itself upon a purely modal-logical
concept of necessity, which entails neither an epistemological meaning nor
an equivalence of “NORMATIVITY” or “PRESCRIPTIVITY.” If one chooses other
systematic basic concepts, the structure of argumentation also has to be
interpreted in other ways. However as noted a somewhat different
interpretation is suggested by SCHÖNECKER/WOOD whom see the [*ONTIC*]
'necessity' of moral laws primarily as their CATEGORICAL character. [Horn &
Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 12-15]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#OPULENCE #DECOROUS #DEMURE #SOVEREIGNTY
Garry Denke's $2,000,000.00 RCC Lawsuit
Original Message
Created at: Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:02 AM (Delivered after 0 seconds)
Subject: Garry Denke's $2,000,000.00 RCC Lawsuit
Download Original Copy to clipboard
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:a0dd:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 09:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:02:19 -0500
Subject: Garry Denke's $2,000,000.00 RCC Lawsuit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba458d0573e0086f"
--000000000000ba458d0573e0086f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
Fucked hard right up the ass!
Dick straight in the mouth!
I should've let him burn!
Cock fucking faggot!
Garry Denke
Garry Denke
--000000000000ba458d0573e0086f
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><a href=3D"https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standar=
dspeaker/">https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/</a><div=
<a href=3D"https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/">https=
://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/</a><br><div><br></div><=
Rev. Girard F. Angelo</div><div>Rev. Girard F. Angelo<br></div><div><br=
</div><div>Fucked hard right up the ass!</div><div>Dick straight in the mo=
uth!</div><div>I should&#39;ve let him burn!</div><div>Cock fucking faggot!=
</div></div><div><br></div><div>Garry Denke</div><div>Garry Denke</div></di=
--000000000000ba458d0573e0086f--
RCC YOU ARE GOING TO PAY $2M
you Holy Ghost blaspheme Faggots!
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/diocese-of-scranton-releases-extended-sexual-abuse-list-1.2373378
https://www.timesleader.com/opinion/op-ed/715019/their-view-memories-of-childhood-priest-now-in-serious-doubt
https://www.citizensvoice.com/grand-jury-sex-abuse-report-identified-59-priests-in-the-diocese-of-scranton-1.2373314
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/street-named-after-reverend-in-question-1.2374907
Fucked hard right up the ass!
Dick straight in the mouth!
I should've let him burn!
Cock fucking faggot!
Garry Denke
Garry Denke
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
JESUS CHRIST
the Creator
Angelo, Girard F.
Born: 04/9/1927
Ordained: 1955
Died: June 29, 2009
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fkscvntw576e4p5/Angelo.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fkscvntw576e4p5/Angelo.pdf?dl=0
Saint Matthew, Stroudsburg, 6/20/1955
Saint Thomas, Archbald, 10/5/1955
Saint Lucy, Scranton, 9/24/1959
Saint Francis, Scranton, 9/19/1962
Mater Dolorosa, Williamsport, 7/1/1963
Our Lady of Grace, Hazleton, 9/3/1969
Saint Raphael, Harleigh, 3/2/1972
Saint Raphael, Harleigh, 9/4/1973
Sacred Heart of Jesus, Harleigh (Pastor Emeritus), 7/3/2003
http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/an_inspiring_shrine_to_the_sacred_heart_of_jesus
http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/an_inspiring_shrine_to_the_sacred_heart_of_jesus
Canonical status: Permanently removed from ministry.
http://youtu.be/0E6qd1jX110
Bernie Kushmider's Landscaping
Garry W. Denke, a foreman
Ralph J. Ferdinand, crew
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/diocese-of-scranton-releases-extended-sexual-abuse-list-1.2373378
https://www.timesleader.com/opinion/op-ed/715019/their-view-memories-of-childhood-priest-now-in-serious-doubt
https://www.citizensvoice.com/grand-jury-sex-abuse-report-identified-59-priests-in-the-diocese-of-scranton-1.2373314
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/street-named-after-reverend-in-question-1.2374907
Garry Denke
Denoco Inc.
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
JESUS
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker!!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/WRkmwlXr7gg
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/umFbAVVfzs4
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/h8NKvi5itmo
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker?!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/Jo0juWbi4mM
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/oRF4V0av4Ag
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/65KuJU3MAA4
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker!?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlements_and_bankruptcies_in_Catholic_sex_abuse_cases
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sex_abuse_cases_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sex_abuse_cases_by_country
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker!!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/HZRy4YZ5qWw
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/Yz-2YV0hKIo
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/XAgSCdzuNYY
G-D
--
The Manifesto of David Koresh
Manifesto of Koresh
The seven Spirits of God are seven of the portable gold artifacts (relics) from
the 1st Spirit - gold Mercy Seat
the 2nd Spirit - gold Ark of the Testimony
the 3rd Spirit - gold Table for the Shewbread
the 4th Spirit - gold Candlestick
the 5th Spirit - gold Ephod-Girdle
the 6th Spirit - gold Breastplate
the 7th Spirit - gold Altar of Incense
המשכן, transliterated Mishkan),
also portable. In the Book of Exodus they are listed and described (Ex
25-40) and in the Book of
Rev 1:4 - John to the seven churches which are in Asia: Grace be unto
you, and peace, from him
which is, and which was, and which is to come; and from the seven
Spirits which are before his
throne;
Rev 3:1 - And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things
saith he that hath the seven
Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a
name that thou livest, and art
dead.
Rev 4:5 - And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and
voices: and there were
seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God.
Rev 5:6 - And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the
four beasts, and in the midst of
the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and
seven eyes, which are the
seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth.
1 - the Spirit of wisdom and understanding,
2 - the Spirit of counsel and might;
3 - the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the LORD.
Mishkan is under Stonehenge Temple, 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone on
bottom of Scroll Trench,
go unearth Exodus' Tabernacle, the seven
Spirits of God, instead of shooting at our children.
David Koresh, Lamb of God
and Lambs' manifesto.
April 1, 1993 AM
Holy Ghost
--
The Manifesto of David Koresh
Manifesto of Koresh
The seven Seals first (1st) Seal at Stonehenge Temple was found at the
intersection of Scroll Trench and the elder Helestone Ditch (where it
once was). Located 2 ft (0.61m) East of Lt-Col William Hawley's 19 May
1923 unexcavated C6 right-angled triangle hypotenuse center at a depth
of 4.5 ft (1.37m) below ground level (GL), this westernmost first (1st)
Seal is now in British Museum. An EM (electromagnetic conductivity)
survey of the remaining six (6) Seals show them distributed at intervals
of one Seal per cubit (1.5 ft, 0.46m) as measured from the horizontal
surface plane. These Seals progressively deepen toward the East downward
to EM detected Tabernacle's (Mishkan's) gold, silver, brass, iron below
Helestone's face of a man (Ez. 1:10, 10:14; Rev. 4:7).
BEGINNING at the first (1st) Phocaea (Ionia) 600 BC produced electrum
stater Seal located along the bottom of Scroll Trench, a 7th-6th century
BC earthwork at Stonehenge Temple, County of Wiltshire, Great Britain,
United Kingdom, said first (1st) Seal found by Robert Newall on 19 May
1923 at the intersection of Scroll Trench and the elder Helestone Ditch
(where it once was), and said first (1st) Seal located 2 ft (0.61m) East
of said Lt-Col William Hawley's 19 May 1923 unexcavated C6 right-angled
triangle hypotenuse center at a depth of 4.5 ft (1.37m) below ground level (GL) surface;
THENCE East 1.5ft (0.46m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected second (2nd) Seal;
THENCE East 1.5 ft (0.46m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected third (3rd) Seal;
THENCE East 2 ft (0.61m)) down Scroll Trench to EM detected fourth (4th) Seal;
THENCE East 2 ft (0.61m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected fifth (5th) Seal;
THENCE East 2.5 ft (0.76m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected sixth (6th) Seal;
THENCE East 2.5ft (0.76m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected seventh (7th) Seal;
THENCE East 3.0 ft (0.91m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected gold, silver, brass, iron;
THE THRONE BEGINNING; in the County of Wiltshire, Great Britain, United Kingdom.
David Koresh
O Lion of Juda
April 1, 1993 AM
http://www.britishmuseum.org/collectionimages/AN00031/AN00031970_001_l.jpg
https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1519864532085.jpg
Holy Ghost
--
The Manifesto of David Koresh
Manifesto of Koresh
You're right.
Nobody.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/183985345/
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/183985345
https://yuki.la/pol/183985345
G-D
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-31 08:28:00 UTC
Permalink
Whom are you that we ought consider any regard?

We have #8 Papal Bulls within our determination as legal recourse and we
are going to first assist others in their recompense and then we will take
the rest...

-- (DRAFT: 31 AUGUST 2018) ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF THE LAMINATED A2 (420 X
594 MM) PRELIMINARY GRAPPLE PARADIGM WITHIN 1998

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 31 August, 2018

Thank-you for your courtesy as letter dated 7 August 2018 as made in reply
to my request of 20 July 2018 wherein you state as confirmation: "However,
luckily we {#334 as [#6, #80, #200, #8, #40] = perach (H6525): {UMBRA: #10
as #288 % #41 = #1} 1) bud, *SPROUT*} remembered that you gave the 4 of us
a laminated A2 (420 x 594 mm) Preliminary Grapple Paradigm. You gave it to
us in 1998 at the end of your visit."

I would however dispute the clarity of such a recollection, since it would
have been from my perspective, surface mailed to yourselves within a tube
container around 2000 as being within proximity to the millennium. However
such a statement would be substantive enough to sustain my $154 million
damages claims which will be pursued once the Financial Services Royal
Commission (not Social Services as you contend) at least produce their
Interim Report to the Governor General by 30 September 2018.

2.5. THE PRACTICAL USE OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY (GMS, 389,36-390,18)
Although the aim of the argumentation appears to be complete, Kant, in the
ensuing paragraph, suggests another form of reasoning for the “NECESSITY”
of a pure moral philosophy. This second argument, however, takes a
completely different direction. Kant’s original question concerning the
necessity of a moral philosophy is not free of ambiguity. For him, it was
at first a matter of a necessity that referred to cognition (“SPECULATION”:
GMS, 389,37) as its goal. It could be SUMMARIZED as follows: ‘*IF* *ONE*
*WANTS* *TO* *OBTAIN* *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *MORAL* *PRINCIPLES*, *THEN* *A*
*PURE* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY* *IS* *AN* *INDISPENSABLE* *MEANS*.’

In Kant’s second argument, a pure moral philosophy is “INDISPENSABLY
NECESSARY” (GMS, 389,36) not only for the correct cognition but also for
the correct action. It could be said, ‘*IF* *ONE* *WANTS* *TO* *CORRECTLY*,
*THEN* *ONE* *NEEDS* *A* *PURE* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*.’ Kant argues thesis:
“BECAUSE MORALS THEMSELVES REMAIN SUBJECT TO ALL SORTS OF CORRUPTION AS
LONG AS THAT GUIDING THREAD AND SUPREME NORM OF THEIR CORRECT JUDGMENT IS
LACKING” (GMS, 390,2f.). The implication contained in this argument seems,
at first sight, quite strong, but it is not clear whether Kant actually
advocates it so strongly. Do we really need a philosophical moral theory in
order to act correctly? Are we compelled to rely on a kind of philosophical
expertise when dealing with moral questions?

“THANK YOU FOR YOUR LETTER. I MUST ADMIT THAT WE DON’T UNDERSTAND A LOT OF
IT AND WOULD BE SURPRISED IF THE SOCIAL SERVICES DO!”

RESPONSE@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 46 (#87); Ego: 33 (#49),
Male: #87; Feme: #49
}

What is essential to such a claim, is that your response was made
VOLUNTARILY and it can then be validated as authenticity by an appraisal
made against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as conveying both a
lack of SENSIBILITY {

H5039@{
   @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
   @2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
   @3: Sup: 1 (#103); Ego: 30 (#82),
   @4: Sup: 6 (#109); Ego: 5 (#87),
   Male: #109; Feme: #87
} // #87

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #87 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness; I-Ching:
H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording; Tetra: 73 -
Already Fording, Completion;

THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance at
Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.

    #VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
    #TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
    #POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
    #TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
    #CANON: #115

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
   @3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
   @4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
   Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115

#87 as [#50, #2, #30, #5] = nebalah (H5039): {UMBRA: #11 as #87 % #41 = #5}
1) *SENSELESSNESS*, folly; 1a) disgraceful folly; 1a1) of immorality,
profane actions; 1b) disgrace, contumely disgrace;

} about any importance associated with such artefact (as you rightfully say
it was 20 years ago) as having any intrinsic worth, and that rightfully I
had conveyed it to yourselves for purposes of SECURITY / SAFETY {

H983@{
   @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
   @2: Sup: 32 (#62); Ego: 2 (#32),
   @3: Sup: 41 (#103); Ego: 9 (#41),
   @4: Sup: 49 (#152); Ego: 8 (#49),
   Male: #152; Feme: #49
} // #49

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the Block;
*I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

    #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
    #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
    #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
    #TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
    #CANON: #180

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
   @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
   @2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
   @3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
   @4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S
WIFE {%19}),
   Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180

#49 as [#30, #2, #9, #8] = betach (H983): {UMBRA: #5 as #19 % #41 = #19} 1)
*SECURITY*, *SAFETY* adverb; 2) securely;

} which is not then reliant upon yourselves retaining any possession of the
OBJECT but rather, that the incongruity of the EVENT disclosure causes you
to have some recollection of it having occurred. Which is sufficient for
my purposes.

Such an implication seems hardly congruent with the rest of Kant’s remarks.
There remains nonetheless the possibility of a weaker interpretation. In
this context, the expression “MORAL PHILOSOPHY” does not entail only the
explicit theory, whose formulation the scientific discipline of philosophy
has as one of its tasks. Rather every human or rational being possesses a
“MORAL PHILOSOPHY” if she has the capacity to act from principle (“FOR THE
SAKE OF”: GMS, 390,5). Accordingly, every being capable of action carries
at least implicitly a moral philosophy in itself.

In the history analytical philosophy the prevailing interpretation of the
meaning of the terms such as 'BEING' or 'EXISTENCE' are as UNIVERSALS
usually defined by NUMBER and specifically the Pythagorean HETEROS THEORY
OF NUMBER and were affirmed with different meanings, respectively
equivalent to being in space and time (ie. MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as a
universal statement which is a singularity compliant with a DIVINE FIAT and
potentiality as a cosmological / language consideration of the
chronological circumscribing given to the 10 commandments as then defining
human consciousness by a cosmological anthropic principle) and being not in
space and time (ie. MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as encapsulated by the
knowledge of a ternary HOMOIOS rather than the binary HETEROS THEORY OF
NUMBER consideration).

Thus we can consider this process of motion by impetus to act in accordance
with KINETIC principles which can be expressed an having utility by a
combining form with the general sense of “movement, activity,” where it is
used in the formation of compound words, often with the particular senses
such as:

PHOTOKINESIS: “reaction to a stimulus”,
TELEKINESIS: “movement without an apparent physical cause”,
KARYOKINESIS: “activity within a cell”.

As primarily concerned with potentiality and actuality which are principles
of a dichotomy which Aristotle used to analyze motion, causality, ethics,
and physiology in his Physics, Metaphysics, Nicomachean Ethics and De
Anima, which is about the human psyche.

The concept of potentiality, in this context, generally refers to any
"POSSIBILITY" that a thing can be said to have. Aristotle did not consider
all possibilities the same, and emphasized the importance of those that
become real of their own accord when conditions are right and nothing stops
them. Actuality, in contrast to potentiality, is the motion, change or
activity that represents an exercise or fulfilment of a possibility, when a
possibility becomes real in the fullest sense.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Potentiality_and_actuality>

The hypothetical postulation is that the cognitive proposition itself is
broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
SENSIBILITIES, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
or attractive.

But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it as
quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being a
declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

Within the basic philosophical sense of inner TELOS, or guiding form, the
entelecheia is that which mediates between #1 - MATTER {ATZILUTH: World of
Emanation / #VIRTUE} and #2 - FORM {BRIYAH: World of Creation / #TOOLS}, #3
- POTENCY {YETZIRAH: World of Formation / #POSITION} and #4 - ACTUALITY
{ASSIYAH: World of Action / #TIME}, the matter or substance of thing
(materia, substantia), as such, convey the essence of a thing (essentia,
ousia) only potentiality, whereas the form, as considered in itself as
actuality, requires embodiment. The actualization of the thing, the union
of matter and form in development and occurrence, the movement from potency
to act, rests upon the inner TELOS, the inward principle of
self-realization; the motive force of the development is kinesis or
metabole, the activity or transition from potency to actuality. Description
of the soul as entelechy marks an important counter; both for philosophy
and for scholastic theology, to Platonic dualism of soul and body.

Potentiality and potency are translations of the Ancient Greek word dunamis
(δύναμις) as it is used by Aristotle as a concept contrasting with
actuality. Its Latin translation is "potentia", root of the English word
potential, and used by some scholars instead of the Greek or English
variants.

In his philosophy, Aristotle distinguished two meanings of the word
dunamis. According to his understanding of nature there was both a weak
sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that something "might
chance to happen or not to happen", and a stronger sense {YANG CH'I as A
MALE}, to indicate how something could be done well.

Dunamis is an ordinary Greek word for possibility or capability. Depending
on context, it could be translated "potency", "potential", "capacity",
"ability", "power", "capability", "strength", "possibility", "force" and is
the root of modern English words "dynamic", "dynamite", and "dynamo". In
early modern philosophy, English authors like Hobbes and Locke used the
English word "power" as their translation of Latin potentia.

Just as Aristotelianism allows no separation of form and matter and no
independent, extra-mental existence of universalia, so does it deny the
dualism or separability of soul and body. The body, in Aristotelianism, is
not regarded as the tomb of the soul, but as the natural place of the
soul's existence where alone it can exercise its faculties of *INTELLECTUS*
and *VOLUNTAS* and in which alone it can perform its formal *GENITIVE*
function.

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}
STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta descriptor
prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift} (1139 CE) /
Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature {MOTHER
(INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of decree deciding
between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2 -
Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents} / #14
/ #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone): Militia
Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do Not Kill} /
#15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its
Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson, child,
member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. -
male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f)
sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or
sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless
things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*,
*ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR / Do
Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John 5:39-47
(KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 - Nature
Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not Steal} /
#17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming
Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial /
bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 - Form
of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso {#7
- The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do Not
Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
   @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
   @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
   @3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
   @4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
   @5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
   @6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
   @7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
   @8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
   @9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
   Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

    #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
    #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
    #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
    #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
    #CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
   @1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
   @2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 - I
INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c)
*WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*, *WHAT*
*IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]

The Sovereign Authority which is bequeathed to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH
by Queen Victoria through the LETTERS PATENT *BY* *THESE* *PRESENTS* and
according to the good word of God as Divine Graciousness, in the bestowal
of a "HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT (DŌREA)" which is a DUNAMIS a POTENTIALITY
requiring EXOUSIA means ‘bearer of ruling authority' as ACTUALITY which
conveys all the necessary "POWERS (DUNAMIS) of the WORLD (AIŌN)" [Ephesians
3:1-21 (KV); Hebrews 6:4-12 (KJV)] as expressing the totality of the
AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA to the "Sovereign and Autonomous
Right", the "Power to Rule" and "Dispense Justice" by "Edict as a Divine
Authority" being PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY which can be
understood in our knowledge of God (GODHEAD/DIVINE NATURE AS MIND),
and having thereby, invalidated those Letters Patent to the Federation of
the Commonwealth of Australia of 1901, as to be then declared, apparent
and permitted the status as authority, powers and privilege accorded within
it's own entitlement as Sovereignty implicit to the Federation as
Commonwealth of Australia.

YOUTUBE: "I am, you are, we are Australian"



#6 - FORM OF NATURE / #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {VAV / *POWERS* (Gk.
Arche - a commencement, or (concrete) *chief* (*in* *various*
*applications* *of* *order*, *time*, *place* *or* *rank*):--beginning,
corner, (at the, the) first (estate), *magistrate*, power, principality,
principle, rule)}

VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.

#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN /
*PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. Exousia - (in the sense of ability); privilege, that
is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom, or (objectively)
mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate, *token* *of*
*control*), delegated influence:--authority, jurisdiction, liberty, power,
right, strength)}

IX - AUTHORITY "TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO
SHALL SEEM MEET" IS GIVEN BY THE "*TIME* *TO* *TIME*" AND "GOVERNOR
GENERAL'S *INCAPACITY*" PROVISIONS OF THE CLAUSE RELATING TO THE ENNEAD -
#20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF NATURE (#9 -
AUTONOMOUS NATURE)} *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR*
*LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our said
Commonwealth.

*NO* *SUCH* *POWERS* *OR* *AUTHORITIES* *SHALL* *VEST* IN SUCH LIEUTENANT
GOVERNOR, OR SUCH OTHER PERSON OR PERSONS, *UNTIL* *HE* *OR* *THEY* *SHALL*
*HAVE* *TAKEN* *THE* *OATHS* *APPOINTED* WHICH IS NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE WE
ARE DRAWING DISTINCTION BETWEEN WHAT GOD IS AN OATH MADE AS GODHEAD/DIVINE
MIND DEFINED BY EITHER THE HETEROS OR HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AND
SUPERSEDING THE PATENTS BY THE LATER?

In this ontological view, the human being is termed a composite substance
(substantia compositiva) and the soul in itself termed spiritus
incompletus. Thus the Protestant scholastics can call the soul the #6 -
FORMA CORPORIS, or form of the body, defining the body itself as the
formata, or thing formed." [(c) 1985, Richard A. Muller, Dictionary of
Latin and Greek Theological Terms, p 104]

Therefore, fleshed—out scientific theories can help us make explicit the
implicit philosophical knowledge that is present in every person and
therewith isolate the a priori part from the empirical part. Such an
explicit knowledge can serve as a reliable “GUIDING THREAD” for action.
According to Kant, one can speak of a “PURITY OF MORALS” (GMS, 390,17) only
if the normative principles with which we ground our actions are “PURE” and
contain no “empirical” elements.

Thus, the scientific discipline of philosophy has a supporting but not a
constitutive function for the morality of our conduct. A metaphysics of
morals, as an explicitly fleshed-out philosophical theory, can, however,
offer a supporting contribution in making the “IDEA OF A PURE PRACTICAL
REASON,” which, according to Kant, lies in each of us, “EFFECTIVE IN
CONCRETO” (GMS, 389,35).

As you may observe still rather busy with my workload after 24 years of
informal research into the obtuse province of metempiricial / metaphysical
perennialist philosophy having a specialist expertise in Queen Victoria's
Letters Patent to the Federation of the Australian Commonwealth in 1901,
and have subsequently begun a syncretism of Immanuel Kant's Groundwork for
the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) and the Critique of Pure Reason (1781 /
1787), which ware enormous works and one of the most important on Western
thought.

It perhaps presumptuous of me at only page #16 of #323 pages to already be
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis that
there must be a “PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which is “SELF EVIDENT" given that
there are seven day designates within our understanding of the cosmology
which is understood universally as an implicit law of nature. And that the
subject we are contending with is a consideration of profound intellectual
accomplishments conveyed by a book which articulates the merit as
collective mind of no fewer than 14 eminent university professors.

It has been my task to have commenced reading it on weekend of 25 August
2018 in the hope that probity and decorum will return (ie. I NOTE THAT ON
THE MONDAY FOLLOWING THE PRIME MINISTER LEADERSHIP SPILL OCCURRING UPON 23
AUGUST 2018 THAT THE SWEARING OF OATHS OF OFFICE ARE NOW MADE TO THE PEOPLE
OF THE COMMONWEALTH AND NOT TO THE SOVEREIGN) to the governance of this
Commonwealth given its CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- IMPUGNING AS CURSING THE SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- IMPUGNING OUR ENTITLEMENT TO FAIR JUSTICE;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS*
/ *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- AS A BATTLE CRY THEN IMPUGNING OUR BOER / ANZAC TRADITION WHOM HAVE
ENGAGED WITHIN THEATRES OF WAR;

+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- IMPUGNING OUR RIGHT TO RELIGIOUS BELIEF IN THE EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL
WITHOUT COERCION;

H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE

H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU {*LOGICAL* *FALLACY* *WITHIN*
*BINOMIAL* *PYTHAGOREAN* *HETEROS* *THEORY* *OF* *NUMBER* *DERIVED*
*BELIEF* *SYSTEMS* *AND* *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE AS HUMAN NATURE BEING THE
DISCRIMINATING NORM}

Although I have already within 6 days, as written some 100 pages as
substantive and reasonable argumentation, was indeed prudent to firstly
have established the starting point of necessity as to any premises for the
continuity of enquiry, in doing so I recognise as my ignorance with respect
to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the subject matter to
say nothing of those whom may have given their lives as something other
than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is best to
proceed with caution and in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with
the intoxication of self-entitlement which others might bestow.

Whereby the dialectical method is itself an anthropological construct,
which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state as one's opinion; origin late
Middle English: from Latin opinari think, believe} as existentialism
purveying a characteristic mode of quantitative expression in being
essentially idiomatic:

'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'

But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof is
devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated making
vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then sublimated
into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of merit in
valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as an opportune
expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted into a Hall of Fame
as a maxim life. As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse between two or more
people holding different points of view about a subject but wishing to
establish the truth through reasoned arguments as its imperative:

#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS

Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} ontological conception
of #NUMBER deploys a binomial {64 bits} encapsulation as artifice it then
introduces a logical contradiction {H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81} within it’s
DISCRIMINATING NORM and the SOCIETAL ORDER of things by an
incommensurability made against the proprietary, propriety and probity as
the viability of SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE which properly is the
paradigmatic providence and *ONTIC* necessity {H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41} as
their SOVEREIGN and central characteristic within the Formula of Autonomy
by its purveyance of permissibility only within the construct of an
INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of a TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE AS CANON
OF TRANSPOSITION within the bifurcated HETEROS {@1 - GENDER {MARRIAGE} / @5
- PHALLUS {HERITAGE} conception of #NUMBER as the philosophical basis to
its methodology since the MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS
WISDOM SO CALLED is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather
“homeomorphic to a circle”.



<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D / #0 -
21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY FOR
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive statements
made against the Formula of Humanity which present an account on how the
cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to the LIMITED {#9 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS /
SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative
statements presenting an evaluative account, or an account of how the
syncretic world should be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally something that should be
lived up to; or that should be pursued.

Thusly, having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality of
Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly free of
the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial biological duality
as the HETEROS viability of things "independently of their appearing to us"
and whether there is to be deduced by a HOMOIOS noumena modality as the
vital basis for a singularity of existence by which humanity is rationally
capable of conceiving "things as they are understood by pure thought."

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#SENSIBILITY #ALTRUISM #SELF #JUSTIFICATION
Garry Denke's $2,000,000.00 RCC Lawsuit
Original Message
Created at: Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:02 AM (Delivered after 0 seconds)
Subject: Garry Denke's $2,000,000.00 RCC Lawsuit
Download Original Copy to clipboard
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:a0dd:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 09:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:02:19 -0500
Subject: Garry Denke's $2,000,000.00 RCC Lawsuit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba458d0573e0086f"
--000000000000ba458d0573e0086f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
Fucked hard right up the ass!
Dick straight in the mouth!
I should've let him burn!
Cock fucking faggot!
Garry Denke
Garry Denke
--000000000000ba458d0573e0086f
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><a href=3D"https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standar=
dspeaker/">https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/</a><div=
<a href=3D"https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/">https=
://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/</a><br><div><br></div><=
Rev. Girard F. Angelo</div><div>Rev. Girard F. Angelo<br></div><div><br=
</div><div>Fucked hard right up the ass!</div><div>Dick straight in the mo=
uth!</div><div>I should&#39;ve let him burn!</div><div>Cock fucking faggot!=
</div></div><div><br></div><div>Garry Denke</div><div>Garry Denke</div></di=
--000000000000ba458d0573e0086f--
RCC YOU ARE GOING TO PAY $2M
you Holy Ghost blaspheme Faggots!
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
Rev. Girard F. Angelo
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/diocese-of-scranton-releases-extended-sexual-abuse-list-1.2373378
https://www.timesleader.com/opinion/op-ed/715019/their-view-memories-of-childhood-priest-now-in-serious-doubt
https://www.citizensvoice.com/grand-jury-sex-abuse-report-identified-59-priests-in-the-diocese-of-scranton-1.2373314
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/street-named-after-reverend-in-question-1.2374907
Fucked hard right up the ass!
Dick straight in the mouth!
I should've let him burn!
Cock fucking faggot!
Garry Denke
Garry Denke
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
JESUS CHRIST
the Creator
Angelo, Girard F.
Born: 04/9/1927
Ordained: 1955
Died: June 29, 2009
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fkscvntw576e4p5/Angelo.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fkscvntw576e4p5/Angelo.pdf?dl=0
Saint Matthew, Stroudsburg, 6/20/1955
Saint Thomas, Archbald, 10/5/1955
Saint Lucy, Scranton, 9/24/1959
Saint Francis, Scranton, 9/19/1962
Mater Dolorosa, Williamsport, 7/1/1963
Our Lady of Grace, Hazleton, 9/3/1969
Saint Raphael, Harleigh, 3/2/1972
Saint Raphael, Harleigh, 9/4/1973
Sacred Heart of Jesus, Harleigh (Pastor Emeritus), 7/3/2003
http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/an_inspiring_shrine_to_the_sacred_heart_of_jesus
http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/an_inspiring_shrine_to_the_sacred_heart_of_jesus
Canonical status: Permanently removed from ministry.
http://youtu.be/0E6qd1jX110
Bernie Kushmider's Landscaping
Garry W. Denke, a foreman
Ralph J. Ferdinand, crew
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/diocese-of-scranton-releases-extended-sexual-abuse-list-1.2373378
https://www.timesleader.com/opinion/op-ed/715019/their-view-memories-of-childhood-priest-now-in-serious-doubt
https://www.citizensvoice.com/grand-jury-sex-abuse-report-identified-59-priests-in-the-diocese-of-scranton-1.2373314
https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/street-named-after-reverend-in-question-1.2374907
Garry Denke
Denoco Inc.
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7148868/standardspeaker/
JESUS
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker!!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/WRkmwlXr7gg
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/umFbAVVfzs4
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/h8NKvi5itmo
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker?!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/Jo0juWbi4mM
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/oRF4V0av4Ag
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/65KuJU3MAA4
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker!?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlements_and_bankruptcies_in_Catholic_sex_abuse_cases
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sex_abuse_cases_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sex_abuse_cases_by_country
Where's my $2 Million you Mother Fucker!!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/HZRy4YZ5qWw
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/Yz-2YV0hKIo
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.atheism/XAgSCdzuNYY
G-D
--
The Manifesto of David Koresh
Manifesto of Koresh
The seven Spirits of God are seven of the portable gold artifacts (relics) from
the 1st Spirit - gold Mercy Seat
the 2nd Spirit - gold Ark of the Testimony
the 3rd Spirit - gold Table for the Shewbread
the 4th Spirit - gold Candlestick
the 5th Spirit - gold Ephod-Girdle
the 6th Spirit - gold Breastplate
the 7th Spirit - gold Altar of Incense
המשכן, transliterated Mishkan),
also portable. In the Book of Exodus they are listed and described (Ex
25-40) and in the Book of
Rev 1:4 - John to the seven churches which are in Asia: Grace be unto
you, and peace, from him
which is, and which was, and which is to come; and from the seven
Spirits which are before his
throne;
Rev 3:1 - And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things
saith he that hath the seven
Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a
name that thou livest, and art
dead.
Rev 4:5 - And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and
voices: and there were
seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God.
Rev 5:6 - And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the
four beasts, and in the midst of
the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and
seven eyes, which are the
seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth.
1 - the Spirit of wisdom and understanding,
2 - the Spirit of counsel and might;
3 - the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the LORD.
Mishkan is under Stonehenge Temple, 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone on
bottom of Scroll Trench,
go unearth Exodus' Tabernacle, the seven
Spirits of God, instead of shooting at our children.
David Koresh, Lamb of God
and Lambs' manifesto.
April 1, 1993 AM
Holy Ghost
--
The Manifesto of David Koresh
Manifesto of Koresh
The seven Seals first (1st) Seal at Stonehenge Temple was found at the
intersection of Scroll Trench and the elder Helestone Ditch (where it
once was). Located 2 ft (0.61m) East of Lt-Col William Hawley's 19 May
1923 unexcavated C6 right-angled triangle hypotenuse center at a depth
of 4.5 ft (1.37m) below ground level (GL), this westernmost first (1st)
Seal is now in British Museum. An EM (electromagnetic conductivity)
survey of the remaining six (6) Seals show them distributed at intervals
of one Seal per cubit (1.5 ft, 0.46m) as measured from the horizontal
surface plane. These Seals progressively deepen toward the East downward
to EM detected Tabernacle's (Mishkan's) gold, silver, brass, iron below
Helestone's face of a man (Ez. 1:10, 10:14; Rev. 4:7).
BEGINNING at the first (1st) Phocaea (Ionia) 600 BC produced electrum
stater Seal located along the bottom of Scroll Trench, a 7th-6th century
BC earthwork at Stonehenge Temple, County of Wiltshire, Great Britain,
United Kingdom, said first (1st) Seal found by Robert Newall on 19 May
1923 at the intersection of Scroll Trench and the elder Helestone Ditch
(where it once was), and said first (1st) Seal located 2 ft (0.61m) East
of said Lt-Col William Hawley's 19 May 1923 unexcavated C6 right-angled
triangle hypotenuse center at a depth of 4.5 ft (1.37m) below ground level (GL) surface;
THENCE East 1.5ft (0.46m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected second (2nd) Seal;
THENCE East 1.5 ft (0.46m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected third (3rd) Seal;
THENCE East 2 ft (0.61m)) down Scroll Trench to EM detected fourth (4th) Seal;
THENCE East 2 ft (0.61m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected fifth (5th) Seal;
THENCE East 2.5 ft (0.76m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected sixth (6th) Seal;
THENCE East 2.5ft (0.76m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected seventh (7th) Seal;
THENCE East 3.0 ft (0.91m) down Scroll Trench to EM detected gold, silver, brass, iron;
THE THRONE BEGINNING; in the County of Wiltshire, Great Britain, United Kingdom.
David Koresh
O Lion of Juda
April 1, 1993 AM
http://www.britishmuseum.org/collectionimages/AN00031/AN00031970_001_l.jpg
https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1519864532085.jpg
Holy Ghost
--
The Manifesto of David Koresh
Manifesto of Koresh
You're right.
Nobody.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/183985345/
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/183985345
https://yuki.la/pol/183985345
G-D
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Loading...